Among the problems with our country’s system of meat production is the routine use of antibiotics in livestock. Dosing the animals regularly helps them grow faster and survive cramped factory-farm conditions, which means cheap, abundant meat for consumers. The problem is that overusing antibiotics contributes to antibiotic resistance. Cheap meat doesn’t seem like such a bargain when more and more people are dying from antibiotic-resistant infections.
Representative Louise Slaughter (D-NY) has introduced the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act of 2009 (HR 1549), which would ban animal uses of seven classes of antibiotics important to human health, and restrict the uses of other antibiotics in animals. The New York Times’ Gardiner Harris reports that opposition from the farm lobby makes this bill unlikely to pass on its own, but that the measure could be included in health reform legislation.
In a hearing about the bill, Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, Principal Deputy Commissioner at FDA voiced the Obama administration’s support for curbs on the use of antibiotics in livestock:
FDA supports the idea of H.R. 1549 to phase out growth promotion/feed efficiency uses of antimicrobials in animals. The current statutory process of withdrawing a new animal drug approval is very burdensome on the agency. FDA recommends that any proposed legislation facilitate the timely removal of nonjudicious uses of antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals. At the same time, FDA believes that legislation should permit the judicious use of antimicrobials in animals for prevention and control …
Antimicrobial resistance is an important public health issue that can only be addressed by collaborative efforts of the relevant Federal agencies, state health departments, and the private sector. FDA looks forward to working with Congress on this important public health issue.
Maryn McKenna at Suberbug has more on the hearing, including an observation that the Pew Commission on Human Health and Industrial Farming doesn’t think Scharfstein’s position goes far enough. Still, it’s great to have a member of the administration acknowledging this important public health issue and expressing a willingness to take steps toward a solution.
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
June 30, 2010 at 7:16 am
Marilynn
It’s been proven that big industries just don’t regulate themselves with the public’s interest in mind. Recent Wall Street and BP oil spill debacles are painful evidence that “we the people” are the ones who take the hit.
Big factory farms are abhorrent places for animals. If you’ve ever driven past one, you know the stench of the feces they stand in all day (which probably gets into their bloodstreams and into their meat for us to eat). And the antibiotics pumped into them are, of course, dangerous for humans.
If we can’t do away with factory farms, then I hope we can at least vote for people who support tough regulations on the antibiotics that can be legally administered to the animals and left in the meat for us to eat.