<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No new whistleblower protection for WV miners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepumphandle.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/no-new-whistleblower-protection-for-wv-miners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepumphandle.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/no-new-whistleblower-protection-for-wv-miners/</link>
	<description>A water cooler for the public health crowd</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wood</title>
		<link>http://thepumphandle.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/no-new-whistleblower-protection-for-wv-miners/#comment-37658</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepumphandle.wordpress.com/?p=816#comment-37658</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure where the comments went.  But let me repeat the gist of my own.  For the record, on-the-job (as opposed to commuting) traffic fatalities MUST be reportable in at least two states:  Washington and (since January 2007) Oregon.  In at least some cases, we need to investigate these fatalities to more fully understand them, and in some circumstances the "causes" can themselves be prompted by work-related causes (scheduling, etc.) that will not be identified in a traditional law-enforcement investigation.  

Here in Oregon we also are asking employers questions about how they handle driving in the workplace as part of our consultation and enforcement visits -- all this is an effort to better understand the issues by gathering as much information as possible.

Michael Wood, CSP
Administrator, Oregon OSHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure where the comments went.  But let me repeat the gist of my own.  For the record, on-the-job (as opposed to commuting) traffic fatalities MUST be reportable in at least two states:  Washington and (since January 2007) Oregon.  In at least some cases, we need to investigate these fatalities to more fully understand them, and in some circumstances the &#8220;causes&#8221; can themselves be prompted by work-related causes (scheduling, etc.) that will not be identified in a traditional law-enforcement investigation.  </p>
<p>Here in Oregon we also are asking employers questions about how they handle driving in the workplace as part of our consultation and enforcement visits &#8212; all this is an effort to better understand the issues by gathering as much information as possible.</p>
<p>Michael Wood, CSP<br />
Administrator, Oregon OSHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
